# 2 Post - Question - Is the Taj Mahal Building in Laguna Hills an icon for the city that should be saved? The Laguna Hills City Council says the Taj Mahal Building is not a city icon and gives permission to destroy it as necessary for a revitalization project. What do you think?
# 1 Post - TERM LIMITS for LAGUNA HILLS CITY COUNCIL
At the 6/24/08, City Council Meeting City Council Member Melody Carruth introduced the topic of Term Limits for the Laguna Hills City Council. The members of the city council have been the same people for almost 17 years now. She made a motion to direct the city attorney to prepare an ordinance with 2 four year consecutive terms followed by a 2 year break, modeled after the Laguna Niguel term limits ordinance, and return on July 8 with this. She noted that term limit ordinances are popular with voters and 21 of 34 local Orange County cities have term limits ordinances. Term Limits provide opportunities for more citizens to serve, different viewpoints, and create an active political process by increasing the pool of candidates and choices for voters. They balance the need for strong experienced leadership and fresh perspectives. In Laguna Hills we have plenty of strong experienced leadership in the community as well as on the city council. The power of incumbency discourages potential candidates. She cited that twice in Laguna Hills there have been no elections due to no candidates opposing the incumbents.
Citizen Speaker - Mr. Tom Epperson (Laguna Hills) said the lack of term limits discourages talented people from running for office because of the high cost of running and the slim chance that they will be able to unseat a long time incumbent. He said he believes that new council members will be interested and involved in governing the city for all the citizens not just, as some people believe, for a good old boys club. He said elected office should not be a career job and breaking connections between long term city council members and various special interest groups will be broken by city council members who are not career politicians. They will be a source of new ideas and old habits of city staff and departments will face skepticism and questioning about attitudes such as "this is the way we've always done it". When voters continue to see the same names on the ballot each time attendance at the polls suffers. New candidates and new issues will bring voters back to the polls. .
City Council Member Randall Bressette - responds to Mr. Epperson with - "I'll tell you sir, you are a special interest and you should stand up and acknowledge that." (Mr. Bressette is apparently referring to the fact that Mr. Epperson is one of the pet owners who wants better animal care services for the city of Laguna Hills. Because Laguna Hills failed to negotiate a contract with the Mission Viejo Animal Shelter and failed to work with other cities for a joint city shelter Mr. Epperson has been working with the county supervisors to improve services through the 65 year old over crowded county shelter)
City Council Member Bressette asks if Laguna Hills wants rookies to set long term policies and budgets for our city council, and if we don't want the benefits that come through wisdom and experience? (Question-Assuming Mr. Bressette has wisdom and experience why does he fail to consider that other Laguna Hills residents may also be qualified and have wisdom and similar experience. During our history there have been fewer than 20 people come forward to run for office including the 6 that have actually held office. Many qualified residents (Observation-here Mr. Bressette admits there are qualified residents?) simply will not run for office. There is no overwhelming public sentiment towards term limits in Laguna Hills or you would have spent the last 2 years on the streets in front of supermarkets collecting signatures that would allow you bypass the process you suggested tonight and to go directly to the ballot. (Observation-Maybe we hoped the city council with all their wisdom and experience would save citizens that trouble and better yet, know when to quit?)
Randy proposed a substitute measure to educate the public - that the city council ask the city attorney to prepare a report that provides details of the method of placing this measure on the ballot, the language that is required, the necessary timing of any proposed ballot measure. a sample ballot measure for our consideration that provides a variety of term limit options for our discussion, and his legal opinion as to whether a term limit ordinance is constitutionally legal. (Observation-Melody Carruth told us 21 other cities in Orange County have term limit ordinances already?) Also, he asked that staff be directed to provide the details of the cost of placing this measure on the ballot, and provide the methodology of how the city council could obtain an impartial report of how they would measure the effectiveness of the city government with and without term limits and how they would then communicate that to the residents.
City Council Member Melody Carruth stated that Randy is asking for a lot of information to better educate himself on this process but over the years although the city has conducted all sorts of surveys, workshops and forums, they have never asked the citizens any questions regarding the city government. When the city was being formed they did ask a question about districting vs. at large election for city council but never asked about limiting the length of time of service for city council members. Melody stated she believes this is an issue that the voters understand she has confidence in the intelligence of the voters that they can be trusted to determine what is right for the city. Lobbies and special interests don't like term limits as evidenced by their efforts to extend the terms at the state level. That was voted down by the citizens.
City Council Member Craig Scott - says he rejects the idea that anyone on the city council is being influenced by any special interest groups. "No amount of study is going to change my mind.' This is and has always been and will always be unwise. " I oppose both the initial and the substitute motion." (Observation-Craig Scott writes legal text books for others to study?)
Mayor Allan Songstad asked, if there should be a directly elected mayor? Then said he didn't run for re-election after his first term until 2 years later and he was then re-elected, so term limits are not necessary. He said that the most common way for term limits to be placed on the ballot is through a citizen initiative and that has never happened in Laguna Hills, also no one has even requested term limits in Laguna Hills other than Council Member Carruth. (Someone has tonight - Mr. Tom Epperson - see above) He also said he didn't understand why Council Member Carruth brought up this issue on June 24th when she's had 2 years to do it and he asked her, "Were you asleep?".
City Council Member Melody Carruth - stated she hoped the council would just adopt an ordinance for Term Limits because it's a good idea to put this before the voters and allow the voters of Laguna Hills to have a choice. This is not a new topic and plenty of other cities have done this as a simple basic ordinance. There are many examples of the language they have used, including the language for Laguna Niguel that I brought to the meeting, so it should not be a complicated issue. (City Council Member Melody Carruth did step down from her seat to give others a chance as follows - Choosing not to seek a second term, Carruth focused her energies on the anti-airport campaign and served as a director of Taxpayers for Responsible Planning, as a member of the ETRPA Land Use Committee and as Laguna Hills Chair for the Yes on W - Stop the Airport campaign)
Greg Simonian, City Attorney stated - Deadline for to get a measure to the registrar of voters is August 8 to get it on the Nov. ballot. State Law authorizes city councils to prepare proposals for term limits to be acted on here at the local level but that ordinance would not be effective unless and until it is submitted to the electorate for a decision by the voters. He went on to state that he could drop other matters and urgently prepare an ordinance for Term Limits to bring back on July 8, if so directed by the city council. He said he would need specific direction tonight related to the terms of the ordinance that would be acceptable to the council such as 2 or 4 year terms and how many years off, after how long, etc. and exactly what optional provisions should be included to be able to get all of this prepared in time to meet the deadline.
City Council Member Joel Lautenschleger said the City Council Members in Laguna Hills are accessible and he thinks it is insulting to say to the residents that they do not have the right to keep somebody in office that is experienced. He said he does not believe in the incumbent advantage. He said he was offended by the special interest or lobby suggestion. He stated he is a member of the YMCA Board, and a responsible public servant and if people don't believe that they should vote him out of office. The reason for people to stay is to build up trust and credibility and that can't be done until someone has been there for a number of years. (Observation-Apparently Joel does not blieve that any new council member could be a "good" council member and that maybe it's specifically because of a lack of trust in the community for these council members that the voters may want a change?)
(Observation-According to the reasoning of the men on this city council it was not possible for them to have been such super powers of wisdom and experience when they were first elected as they now consider themselves to be but they believe they have done a great job, so, the question is could citizens benefit from new city council members with broader less self indulgent perspectives, talent, ability and a sincere desire to serve the citizens?)
City Council Member Melody Carruth's motion for the city attorney to bring back a proposed ordinance for term limits on July 8 was voted down 4 to 1
City Council Member Randall Bressette's motion to do a lengthy study of the issue of term limits was voted down as well.
Laguna Hills general election information (from the OC Register News report by Alejandra Molina)
The general municipal election for Laguna Hills is Nov. 4. Two seats on the City Council are open. The term for office is four years and council members will be paid $623.66 per month. Registered voters may nominate between July 14 and Aug. 8. The nomination period will be extended for all interested persons other than incumbents to Aug. 13. Candidates must be registered voters and reside in the city. Information: 949-707-2635
21 comments:
I read the discussion in the Watch Dog and agree 100%. Laguna Hills, and all other Orange County cities, according to a Register survey that indicated 87% of those responding favored term limits for Orange County city councils.
I also agree. If city council members are not willing to step down once in a while to give other citizens a chance to share in city government, the citizens need to step them down with term limits. If we can't do that this year then at least vote out the incumbents 17years is too long.
Some people might advocate that long-term politicians can get things done more efficiently because they "know the ropes", whereas a junior politician has to start from the bottom and work his way up the political ladder of power and respect. The false impression is that these junior politicians simply can't get things done. However, history proves otherwise. In fact, it is the junior politicians who usually come up with the best ideas about how to deal with an existing problem because they actually spend the time to try and figure out a solution. On the other hand, the long-term politician either 'goes with the flow', in fear of losing the respect of his fellow cronies, or they follow strict party lines, in fear of losing the support of their party. To see more go to: http://www.johnatuttle.com/grip.html
These council members were not so full of wisdom and experience when Laguna Hills was becoming a city.
Because they were not paying attention and some did not realize the value of that land Mission Viejo was able to annex the land to the East of Cabot Road, by the railroad tracks, and later develop it into a thriving commercial center. The Laguna Hills City Council still apparently holds a grudge against Mission Viejo about this and that is probably why they did not want to partner with Mission Viejo to use their animal shelter. This is no example of wisdom and experience it is poor judgement and foolish. The Mission Viejo City Council does have term limits so the group who outsmarted the Laguna Hills City Council is long gone but rather than learning from experience and putting the needs of their citizens first the Laguna Hills City Council apparently prefers to stick around forever and carry a grudge. An old timer who is paying attention
Council Member Carruth was correct. Why are the citizens never asked questions such as, "Would you prefer term limits for the city council members?" on city polls? There should be a chance to give job performance ratings for city council members on he polls too. Apparently the city council is not concerned with the citizens' opinions of how well they are being served by the city council members. It must feel good to live in their own world for 17 years, but that needs to change! Kay E.
I completely agree with Melody and the other blog comments.
Policy-making does not require "knowing the ropes", that's what City Managers are for. It requires level-headed life-based experience, which can come from any of us.
And despite Craig and Joel's protests, they have been influenced by "special interests" at every meeting where a bunch of wouldbe contractors in suits pitches to them--and that would be every meeting they've had in their 17 years there! Let alone who may have contributed to their campaigns.
Dr Bill
I think the Laguna Hills City Council has done an outstanding job watching out for the best interests of all the citizens of Laguna Hills. I oppose term limits at any level. I do not want my choice of candidate denied in the voting booth because of a forced retirement. If I believe an incumbent is doing a good job, I want to be able to keep that person as my representative.
Ms. Carruth is a perfect example of a successful challenge of an incumbent. She replaced a sitting member of the council in her last election. There was a natural term limit by the voters in that particular election. The 4-1majority on the council is correct to oppose forcing term limits on our elections.
The exceptional leadership on the council for the past 17 years is a credit to our community and reflects the informed electorate in our city.
To the Annonymous who opposes Term Limits - you are certainy right about one thing - Melody Carruth is a good example. Unlike many of the men on the city council, she has not allowed inflated ego to replace her need to serve the citizens in Laguna Hills. She does not claim superior wisdom and experience she works hard with multiple citizen groups and charities. She is the only one most of us would wish to keep on the Laguna Hills City Council.
Concerned Citizen
Thank you Dr. Bill, You are exactly right. The city manager is the one who should know the ropes and assist all city council members, new and old, with that. This position does need a level-head and life based experience and hopefully more of a need to serve the citzens than one's own inflated ego. He is also right that special interest groups are present at every city council meeting pitching to the city council. Thank you, Dr. Bill, for letting us know it is possible to have wisdom and experience without being a long term city council member. Jean Bland
The main problems I have found with the Laguna Hills City Council are lack of insight, lack of respect for citizens and their needs and childishly bad behavior toward Melody Carruth especially by Craig Scott and also by Alan Songstad. We need fresh people who can change the tone of this city council. Janette
To me this building is reminiscent of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC where I grew up. There is a nice tranquil feeling around it with it's broad green lawn and pool. Unlike the Laguna Hills City Council I don't believe all of the buildings in Laguna Hills have to have the same Spanish Architecture. I prefer some variety and I notice that other buildings around the Taj Mahal have reflected the tall narrow arches in their designs. Jean Bland
TajMahal Issue-Finally all other council men agree with Melody Carruth on an issue. I don't, I like the landmark but nice to see them all agree. As for term limits and being a long time citizen of Laguna Hills, I support term limits because many times change is good. We need fresh ideas, thoughts and council people who will really listen to their citizens. Too many times I have heard at the council meetings that they won't listen to us and will not even allow us to help on issues when many of us are experts in our fields. I will support new candiates and hopefully we will have some new candiates this election. It is time for change.
As regards the "Taj Mahal" building, since it may be a city monument, how about having a city referendum on it?
Dr Bill
As regards the La Paz Rd greenbelt, it would seem the sensible thing to do would be clean up the debris, landscape to support the indigenous plants and wildlife, and make it useable and enjoyable for all of us by building a bike and jogging/walking path with basic drinking fountain and park-style restrooms. . . oh, and maybe some basic seating that isn't a cement slab with the city seal on it!
Dr Bill
PS. Thank you Jean, for the great notes on the General Plan meeting, and to all those who attended and spoke out against the sports fields.
I agree 100%. I am a resident of Lake Forest and we have basically the same problem there. 4 of the 5 council members have been there nearly since inception, and nearly since inception it has been ruled by the "Gang of 3" spearheaded by council members Dixon and Herzog. Once a group settles in, they pay no attention to the public and just do what they want to do. Often in collusion with their city manager, they opt for what is expedient rather than what is right or what meets contemporary challenges. Having said this about my own city council, I've had the pleasure (?) of attending your city council meetings and have to say that however bad my council is, your council is much worse, with the exception of Ms. Carruth who is a model of what a good council member should be.
Interestingly enough, this sounds just like what has happened in Nellie Gail. I hope the council people watched closely what happened there and make some changes.
Too bad the wrong people want to always hold on to power. Maybe the City Council should Google the story of Cincinnatus?
Cincinnatus - Thanks Annon. This is a great story and very applicable to this situation.
In 458 BCE (according to tradition), Cincinnatus, who had been consul in 460 BCE, was plowing his fields when messengers arrived to tell him he had been named dictator to defend the city against the Aequi and the Volscians. He took up the supreme command, defeated Rome's enemies, freed the beseiged consul Minucius, and returned to his farm, all within 16 days. Further, he refused the honors that came with his military victories. Legend says he was named dictator a second time in 439 BCE, but there is no foundation for this story.
Before I started attending city council meetings, I blindly voted the incumbents back in office every year. Without following any of the local issues, I thought, hey, they were doing a good job, keep them in. Now I have come to realize that incumbents without term limits are similar to dictators. Once they are established in office it is extremely difficult to vote them out. They have name recognition and they have interest groups supporting them who follow the statistics showing that incumbents get re-elected most of the time, so they are backed by these groups that want their needs supported.
Isn’t part of good leadership, being responsible for what comes after they leave office? Wouldn’t it we wise to step down for a while at least and allow one or two seats to be filled by new blood? These new leaders could be groomed by some of the old guard that has been in office since 1991.
Valerie
Mission Viejo Council Member Endorses Term Limits
August 8, 2008. Mission Viejo, CA. Gail Reavis, former mayor of Mission Viejo and 2 term city council member, announced that she would not run for a third term. She said: "While I could run for another term...I felt two terms and 8 years should be the norm." In a related event, former San Juan Capistrano mayor Roy Byrnes commented- "I urge voters not to re-elect any incumbants in November. If you can justify more than 8 years in office, then you can find hair on a billard ball." When asked to comment, a spokesman for the Lake Forest city council Gang of 3 said: "In Lake Forest we like to think our appointments are for life. Term limits would interfere with that. It`s just a difference in philosophy."
Tara Key
Please get out and vote in November. We have an opportunity to vote for two NEW people to replace 17 year council members. Tell everyone you know,share this web site, be active, and make a change. City council meetings seldom have a room full of people. Citizens don't think they can make a difference, even at the city level. By voting, change and new promise await. The idea that some members feel thier experience is so valuable that they should not be unseated. I ask this, what if we never gave new people a chance? Are older teachers in the public schools the only ones that qualify to teach? I think new faces, new ideas, and new approachs to problems is vital to growth. So, move over, and give someone elso a turn.
Jean,
You are amazing. Thank you for the service you are providing us. It is so appreciated. We need change, and new people to make a difference. The old people are out of touch.
Post a Comment